A History of the Ptolemaic Empire by Hölbl Günther

Author:Hölbl, Günther.
Language: eng
Format: epub, pdf
ISBN: 9781135119836
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (CAM)

Notes

1 On the revolts in general: Préaux (1936); Peremans (1978).

2 On the situation during the reign of Philadelphos see p. 62 with notes 151f.; on the revolt under Euergetes I, see p. 49.

3 See, pp. 267, 273.

4 On the so-called Demotic Chronicle in the papyrus Bibliothèque Nationale Paris 215 see P. Kaplony: LÄ I, 1975, 1056–1060 (s.v. Demotische Chronik); the interpretation presented here: J. H. Johnson, ‘Is the Demotic Chronicle an Anti-Greek tract?’, in Grammata Demotka, FS E. Liiddeckens, Würzburg 1984, 107–124; cf. also Huß (1991, 1), 58f.; on Maat as representing the pivotal value of the Egyptian worldview see above p. 1.

5 On this question: Peremans (1975).

6 Cf. Huß (1976), 84f.

7 Goudriaan (1988), 112f., 141 (Doc. 109); cf. Preaux (1936), 529f.

8 Urk. II.183.1–2; Roeder (1960), 181. In a decree of priests, where the Egyptian world order is aligned with the Ptolemaic king as pharaoh and whose enemies are, therefore, enemies of the gods (see p. 156f.), one should place little value on such statements. Such a message, however, is confirmed by papyrological documents for various Egyptian revolts (see here note 6 and p. 181).

9 See p. 157.

10 Cauville-Devauchelle (1984), 35f.

11 The fragmentary Elephantine-Papyrus P. 23641 cannot unfortunately be dated with certainty. It mentions a Herwennefer who ‘has come south while he is revolting in Elephantine (?)’. It may be referring to the aforementioned native king. I would like to thank Prof. Dr K.-Th. Zauzich for elucidating this passage to me in correspondence; cf. Zauzich (1983), 424.

12 On the pharaonic state in Thebes and on source material: Alliot (1951); id. (1952); Pestman (1965); Clarysse (1978); Vandorpe (1986).

13 UPZ II, no. 162, col. 5, 27–30; Pestman (1965); Clarysse (1978); Vandorpe (1986).

14 Pestman (1977), no. 11; K.-Th. Zauzich, ‘Neue Namen für die Könige Harmachis und Anchmachis’, GöttMisz 29, 1978, 157f.; Vandorpe (1986), 300.

15 Clarysse (1978). Both kings were read until recently as ‘Harmachis’ and ‘Anchmachis’; on this: ibid.; F. de Cenival, P. dém.Lille 97 verso, Enchoria 7, 1977, 10f.; Zauzich, loc. cit. (note 14).

16 Gauthier (1916), 426–428.

17 In a graffito from Abydos the expanded form ‘loved by Isis and Osiris …’ appears: Zauzich, loc. cit. (note 14).

18 Pestman (1977), II. 111f.

19 Pestman (1965), 167.

20 Rosettana: Urk. II.180–183; Roeder (1960), 180f.

21 E. Bresciani, in E. Bresciani inter alios, Assuan, Pisa 1978, 141–143 (no. 43). The graffito is dated 7 March 187 BC.

22 Clarysse (1978), 245f.

23 H. Hauben, ‘Des bateaux de Diospolis Mikra? A propos de SB VI 9367 VII et VIII’, in Proceedings of the XVIII Intern. Congr. of Papyrology, 1986, Athens 1988, II, 243–253; id, ‘The Barges of the Komanos family’, AncSoc 19, 1988, 207–211.

24 Zauzich (1983), 424; according to the Elephantine papyrus, P. 15527.

25 Described in the priest decree Philensis II: Urk. II. 217. 6–10; 223. 9–224.2; Sethe (1917), 34, 44, 46; Müller, W. M. (1920), 60f., 74–76; Alliot (1951), 435–438; id. (1952). The date of the battle is read as either 27 or 28 August 186.

26 Philensis II (see previous note): Urk. II.214–230; Sethe (1917); Müller, W. M. (1920), 57–88, Tables 21–40; Daumas (1952), 257–260; Türük (1986), 233f.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.